Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Retroperitoneal laparoscopy (RP) may have some intrinsic advantages over transperitoneal laparoscopy (TP) in certain patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. We reviewed our experience with RP and TP partial nephrectomy to identify differences in intraoperative and postoperative parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS The records of 72 patients (45 TP, 27 RP) undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hand assistance between January 2003 and August 2005 were reviewed. The two groups were similar demographically; tumors were smaller in RP patients (2.1 v 2.7 cm; P = 0.03), and the RP approach was used more frequently on right kidneys (70.4% v 37.8%; P = 0.01). RESULTS The operative time (mean 160 v 192 minutes; P = 0.008) and length of stay (LOS; median 1.0 days [range 1-10 days] v 2.0 days [range 1-64 days]; P = 0.001) were shorter in RP patients. Rates of collecting system entry (22% v 38%), positive-margin rate (0% v 6.7%; P = 0.29), and complications (19% v 22%; P = 0.77) were similar in RP and TP patients. Hemorrhage was the most common complication in both groups. Bowel-related complications occurred in three TP patients, but in no RP patients. Overall, the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was lower in RP patients (100 mL [range 25-3500 mL] v 225 mL [range 25-1900 mL]; P = 0.06). Among patients with complications, EBL was similar in both groups (median 325 mL [50-1500 mL] v 200 mL [50-3500 mL] for RP and TP; P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS The RP approach reduces operative time, LOS, and some types of complications without compromising the quality of tumor resection. Complications in the retroperitoneal space are not associated with higher EBL. Anatomic considerations and surgeon experience may improve outcomes.